British Royals Survive 30 Years Longer Than Their Subjects

Curated by Claudia Shannon / Research Scientist / ishonest

Tim Graham/Getty

They take that Long Live the Queen stuff very seriously.

S. Jay Olshansky, The Conversation

In the U.K. it is customary to receive a personalized message from the queen on your 100th birthdaysuch is the relative rarity of reaching the milestone.

ishonest No.111 - Purge Impurities

No.111 - Purge Impurities

Reaching such a ripe old age isnt uncommon among the British ruling family in fact, my analysis shows that on average they live an additional 30 years compared with their subjects.

I looked at the duration of life of the last six British monarchs, along with the longevity of their spouses and childrenin total 27 royals. What it reveals is a fascinating and familiar story for those of us who study aging and longevity for a living. As a professor of epidemiology and biostatistics, I had previously observed the exact same phenomenon among U.S. presidentsthey also tend to live decades longer than the general population they serve.

If you love ishonests royal coverage, then we hope youll enjoy The Royalist, a members-only series for Beast Inside. Become a member to get it in your inbox on Sunday.

The ruling U.K. monarchs from Queen Victoria onward lived an average of 75 years. And this longevity will continue to rise with each day that Queen Elizabeth IIcurrently age 95lives. Their spouses survived even longer, reaching an average age of 83.5 years. If Victorias husband Prince Albert, who died of suspected typhoid fever at age 42 in 1861, is removed from the equation, the average duration of the life of the spouses of the monarchs was an astonishing 91.7 years.

My Hair Broke Off, and Here is What I Did to Fix It

Learn more

By contrast, the average life duration of the wider U.K. population for the years the monarchs were born throughout this period was only 46 years, according to figures from the Human Mortality Database. For example, the typical life expectancy at birth for a female in the U.K. in 1819 was just under 41 years. Queen Victoria, also born in 1819, was 81 when she died. By the time Elizabeth II was born in 1926, life expectancy at birth for females in the U.K. had risen to 62the queen has already surpassed that by some 33 years.

Such differences in lifespanwith some members of the royal family living to an age double that expected of the general populationare considered in aging circles to be extremely large, but not uncommon.

Lifespan differences of this magnitude are the result of a combination of genetic as well as social and behavioral influences.

No one can live long without first having won the genetic lottery at birth. To maximize the chances of achieving exceptional longevityupward of 85 years old you must begin by being lucky enough to have long-lived parents. But even for those blessed with the gift at birth of the potential for a long life, this is no guarantee youll outlive your contemporaries.

ishonest No.231 - Pigmentation & Blemishes

No.231 - Pigmentation & Blemishes

The next challenge is to avoid behaviors that shorten life. That list is longit is a lot easier to shorten life than extend itbut among the most well known are smoking, eating in excess and lack of exercise.

And then there is the influence of poverty and privilege. Being born into or living in poverty has been shown to be one of the most important factors that shortens lifespanand it is here that perhaps the royals have the greatest advantage.

Further evidence of privilege being a crucial ingredient in the recipe for exceptional longevity can be seen in the fact that the children of the last six U.K. monarchs that died from natural causes lived an average of 69.7 years. This is some 23 years more than the average age of British subjects over that period.

Put simply, British monarchs and their families live so much longer than their subjects for the same reason other subgroups of the population across the globe live longer than contemporaries born in the same year: privilege over poverty. A famous study conducted in Manchester, England, in 2017 demonstrated vast differences in life expectancy depending on the conditions of where people lived. Access to higher education and economic status was directly correlated with longer life, while lower education, income and poverty were linked to shorter lives.

Fun-fact: Cleopatra had acne scars as a teenager - And this oil is all she used

Learn more

In the U.S., similar studies of life expectancy by county, census tract and zip code demonstrated the same phenomenon. In fact, there are multiple instances of dramatic differences in longevity among people living as close as across the street from each othercaused by differences in poverty and privilege.

Differences in duration of life are first defined by genetics, but it is then heavily mediated by education, income, health care, clean water, food, indoor living and working environments, and the overall effects of high or low socioeconomic status.

The long life of Prince Philip is a cause for celebrating the progress of medical science in being able to keep people alive for longer. But it is in part the result of a privilege denied to many and a reminder that humanity has a long way to go to equalize the chances of living a long life.

S. Jay Olshansky is a professor of epidemiology and biostatistics at the University of Illinois at Chicago

Read more on: thedailybeast, live

Learn about unknown needs of your skin for free